Pentagon Exposed For Wasting $125 Billion, Then Does Something Sick After They’re Caught

Your tax dollars hard at work!

0
845

An internal study performed by the Pentagon that revealed a massive $125 billion in administrative waste was buried.

The report was commissioned by the Pentagon by a federal advisory panel of corporate executives and consultants from McKinsey and Company. However, the report was buried because they feared that if the data were made public, Congress would slash the defense budget.

The report, issued in January 2015, would not have required layoffs of civil servants or reductions in military personnel, but rather cut the budget through attrition and early retirements, as well as finding lower-priced contractors.

The Washington Post reports:

The study was produced last year by the Defense Business Board, a federal advisory panel of corporate executives, and consultants from McKinsey and Company. Based on reams of personnel and cost data, their report revealed for the first time that the Pentagon was spending almost a quarter of its $580 billion budget on overhead and core business operations such as accounting, human resources, logistics and property management.

2300-1-pentagon1113

The data showed that the Defense Department was paying a staggering number of people — 1,014,000 contractors, civilians and uniformed personnel — to fill back-office jobs far from the front lines. That workforce supports 1.3 million troops on active duty, the fewest since 1940.

The cost-cutting study could find a receptive audience with President-elect Donald Trump. He has promised a major military buildup and said he would pay for it by “eliminating government waste and budget gimmicks.”

For the military, the major allure of the study was that it called for reallocating the $125 billion for troops and weapons. Among other options, the savings could have paid a large portion of the bill to rebuild the nation’s aging nuclear arsenal, or the operating expenses for 50 Army brigades.

But some Pentagon leaders said they fretted that by spotlighting so much waste, the study would undermine their repeated public assertions that years of budget austerity had left the armed forces starved of funds. Instead of providing more money, they said, they worried Congress and the White House might decide to cut deeper.

So the plan was killed. The Pentagon imposed secrecy restrictions on the data making up the study, which ensured no one could replicate the findings. A 77-page summary report that had been made public was removed from a Pentagon website.

H/T [Washington Post]

swordportion

Scout: Stay Updated

Like Us on Facebook

Engage: Join The Conversation

Join Our Facebook Group

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!

Notify of
avatar
wpDiscuz